They are so damned scared that they feel they have to continue cheating.
January 14, 2008 06:26 PM EST
LAS VEGAS — A Nevada judge said Monday that Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich must be included in Tuesday's candidates' debate in Nevada.
Senior Clark County District Court Judge Charles Thompson said if Kucinich is excluded, he'll issue an injunction stopping the televised debate.
The judge sided with a lawyer for the Ohio congressman, who says debate host MSNBC at first invited Kucinich to take part and then told him last week he couldn't.
A lawyer for the network said MSNBC decided to go with the top three candidates after the Iowa and New Hampshire primaries.
The judge called it a matter of fairness and said Nevada voters will benefit if they hear from more than just Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards.
The cable network and the Democratic Party are calling the 9 p.m. EST debate a chance to hear issues from Nevada's minority communities. Tim Russert and Brian Williams are moderating.
Panagiotis wrote:They are so damned scared that they feel they have to continue cheating.
I don't think anybody is scared. I Don't want to seem too cynical, but the status quo has been set, sometiems I feel as if the battle is lost. Get used to seeing "change" candidates like Obama from now on.


Peacemonger wrote:Chalk one up for free speech!
Englishman in America wrote:Peacemonger wrote:Chalk one up for free speech!
Rub out that chalk mark, the Nevada Supreme Court overturned the decision.

Ziggy wrote:This is not right at all. I'm an Edwards supporter but everyones voice should be heard and to invite him then un-invite him thats just inexcusable. Kucinich and Edwards are the only true liberal in the contest and they want to muzzle both of them, your right. thats not democracy.
Bammo wrote:Ziggy wrote:This is not right at all. I'm an Edwards supporter but everyones voice should be heard and to invite him then un-invite him thats just inexcusable. Kucinich and Edwards are the only true liberal in the contest and they want to muzzle both of them, your right. thats not democracy.
Hey Ziggy, whats your take on ilegal immigration?
This below is a real Ace-Hole's (Acebass) view, and this azz wipe is supposed (yeah sure) to be a liberal, staunch democrat, and big time Edwards supporter, if one can believe that. Oh yeah, forgot Ziggy, he claims to be a Vietnam veteran as well. Life is full of humor, some which is made of plain lies lke this Ace-Hole (Acebass) loves to spread.
Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/1 ... 77502.html
Acebass
I am very disturbed by the tone of this article. It is not anti-immigration it's anti-illegal-immigration. Illegal immigrants are trying to take advantage of this by re-frameing the debate.When someone buys a nice home next to you, doesn't speak your language and proceeds to trash what was once a beautiful home and you don't want your property values affected. Thats not prejudice. When they raise 10 chickens next door to you on a city lot and you get mad, thats not prejudice. When your new neighbors uses your drive way to park in their yard trashing not only their grass but yours and you do something about it, thats not prejudice.This is an invasion not immigration...
| posted 12:01 pm on 12/19/2007
(This is not what John Edwards stands for - is it?)
This Ace-Hole (Acebass) is a known internet racist Ziggy and was banned from forums for his racial comments. I think I can get the screenshots of this racist in action, if you ever want to see them Ziggy.

rightiswrong wrote:Englishman in America wrote:Peacemonger wrote:Chalk one up for free speech!
Rub out that chalk mark, the Nevada Supreme Court overturned the decision.
First The US Supreme Court appoints a president, now a state Supreme Court decides who the candidates will be. This is fascism, the voters no longer have a voice, the Corporations will rule and they will use the courts as their tool of oppression.
The American experiment in Government of the People, by the People, for the People has officially been canceled. Everyone return to your business, nothing to see here, move along. We have assumed control, we have assumed control.
Question: Why do the fundies always tell us they are under siege when it's themselves that are launching the attack on all those that disagree with them.
Animal wrote:rightiswrong wrote:Englishman in America wrote:Peacemonger wrote:Chalk one up for free speech!
Rub out that chalk mark, the Nevada Supreme Court overturned the decision.
First The US Supreme Court appoints a president, now a state Supreme Court decides who the candidates will be. This is fascism, the voters no longer have a voice, the Corporations will rule and they will use the courts as their tool of oppression.
The American experiment in Government of the People, by the People, for the People has officially been canceled. Everyone return to your business, nothing to see here, move along. We have assumed control, we have assumed control.
I hope I'm wrong, but I'm afraid it may well take nothing less than a Second Amendment fix to correct what's been happening in this country. Our Founders weren't just talking about hunting or target shooting when they wrote that one.

rightiswrong wrote:Animal wrote:rightiswrong wrote:Englishman in America wrote:Peacemonger wrote:Chalk one up for free speech!
Rub out that chalk mark, the Nevada Supreme Court overturned the decision.
First The US Supreme Court appoints a president, now a state Supreme Court decides who the candidates will be. This is fascism, the voters no longer have a voice, the Corporations will rule and they will use the courts as their tool of oppression.
The American experiment in Government of the People, by the People, for the People has officially been canceled. Everyone return to your business, nothing to see here, move along. We have assumed control, we have assumed control.
I hope I'm wrong, but I'm afraid it may well take nothing less than a Second Amendment fix to correct what's been happening in this country. Our Founders weren't just talking about hunting or target shooting when they wrote that one.
That may be true, but we're not talking about some people armed with single-shot muskets anymore.
Question: Why do the fundies always tell us they are under siege when it's themselves that are launching the attack on all those that disagree with them.
Animal wrote:rightiswrong wrote:Animal wrote:rightiswrong wrote:Englishman in America wrote:Peacemonger wrote:Chalk one up for free speech!
Rub out that chalk mark, the Nevada Supreme Court overturned the decision.
First The US Supreme Court appoints a president, now a state Supreme Court decides who the candidates will be. This is fascism, the voters no longer have a voice, the Corporations will rule and they will use the courts as their tool of oppression.
The American experiment in Government of the People, by the People, for the People has officially been canceled. Everyone return to your business, nothing to see here, move along. We have assumed control, we have assumed control.
I hope I'm wrong, but I'm afraid it may well take nothing less than a Second Amendment fix to correct what's been happening in this country. Our Founders weren't just talking about hunting or target shooting when they wrote that one.
That may be true, but we're not talking about some people armed with single-shot muskets anymore.
Technical superiority is no guarantee of victory. Look at the Viet Cong. Look at the Iraqi insurgents. Look at what they both were able to accomplish with only assault rifles, rocket launchers, and homemade explosives.

Return to Propaganda And The Media
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests